非傳統安全與台灣軍事戰略的變革（參考文獻 ）

接續參考文獻

1. 陳牧民。2009。〈塔米爾之虎敗亡，斯里蘭卡歷史恩怨難解〉，《青年日報》，6月16日，版7。
2. 楊伯偉。2009。〈印度反恐政策與作為〉，《青年日報》，9月17日，版7。
3. 陸麗心，2008。〈洞悉中共積極發展資訊戰能力對我安全之威脅〉，《青年日報》，2月17日，版3。
4. 2003。〈回祈團：通過暴力建立回教國家〉，《聯合早報》，1月10日。
5. 2007。〈巴基斯坦數百被圍學生投降〉，《BBC中文網》7月4日.http://news.bbc.co.uk/chinese/trad/hi/newsid_6260000/newsid_6268100/6268130.stm)。
6. 2007．〈專家：非傳統安全威脅對世界和平與穩定提出新挑戰〉，《新華網》8月13日，(http://news.xinhuanet.com/newscenter/2007-08/13/content_6524020.htm)。
7. 2008。〈孟買槍手坦承受巴國虔誠軍訓練〉，《自由時報》12月2日(http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/2008/new/dec/2/today-int2.htm)。
8. 2007。〈地球暖化令北極冰層解涷 多國覬覦天然資源〉，《中國時報》10月4日(http://tech.chinatimes.com/2007Cti/2007Cti-News/Inc/2007cti-news-Tech-inc/Tech-Content/0,4703,130509+132007100401261,00.html)。
9. 2009。〈五百隻軍犬營若沒撤 就好了〉，《中國時報》，8月20日。
10. 2009。〈實施幕兵制應從長計議〉，《中央日報網路版》，3月23日，(http://www.cdnews.com.tw/cdnews_site/docDetail.jsp?coluid=110&docid=100705225)。
11. 2009。〈印尼確認「伊斯蘭祈禱團」是雅加達酒店爆炸幕後黑手〉，《國際在線》7月19日〈http://big5.cri.cn/gate/big5/gb.cri.cn/27824/2009/07/19/3365s2566568.htm〉。
12. 2009。〈誰是下一批氣候難民?〉，《新民週刊》8月17日(http://big5.news365.com.cn:82/gate/big5/weekly.news365.com.cn/sh/200908/t20090817_2433336.htm)。13. 2009。〈莫拉克暴雨 破單、雙日紀錄〉，《自由時報》，8月9日，〈http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/2009/new/aug/9/today-fo1.htm〉。
14. 2009。〈台灣大規模導彈試射 馬親往視察〉，《星洲日報》10月15日（http://www.sinchew.com.my/node/134409?tid=2）。
15. 2009。〈第一章 安全情勢 中共軍力持續擴張 威脅區域安全〉，《青年日報》，10月21日，版6。
16. 2009。〈北韓也爆「毒品門」 當局忙收拾〉，《朝鮮日報中文網》4月30日，(http://chn.chosun.com/big5/site/data/html_dir/2009/04/30/20090430000017.html)。

（十）網路上之文獻
1. 王崑義。2009。〈國軍轉型建構可恃武力 確保台海和平〉，《王崑義部落格》，12月9日，(http://blog.sina.com.tw/wang8889999/article.php?pbgid=22448&entryid=594441)
2. 劉思妤、陳彥宏。2006。〈黃金面紗的骷髏－東南亞海盜背景與近況〉，《海安論壇》8月15日，(http://solomonchen.name/download/05/05-22-20060915.pdf)。
3. 李禮仲。2005。〈國際防制洗錢之新趨勢－防堵恐怖份子利用全球金融機構〉，《洗錢防制中心2005年年報》，轉引至《財團法人國家政策基金會》4月27日(http://old.npf.org.tw/PUBLICATION/FM/094/FM-B-094-004.htm)。
4. 2009．〈莫拉克颱風災害應變處置報告第74報〉，《行政院災害防救委員會》9月8日(http://www.nfa.gov.tw/upload/content/2009%5C20090908%5C20099822222479.pdf)。

二、英文部份

（一）專書
1. Akaha, Tsuneo. 2002.Nontraditional Security Issues in Northeast Asia and Prospects for International Cooperation, Paper presented at “Thinking Outside the Security Box: Nontraditional Security in Asia,” .New York: United Nations University Seminar.
2. Bridges, William. 1991. Managing Transitions. Boston: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
3. Buzan, Barry. 1991. People, States, and Fear: An Agenda for International Security Studies in the Post-Cold War Era. Boulder CO: L. Rienner Publishers.
4. Harris, Paul G.. 2001.The Environment, International Relations, and U.S. Foreign Policy ( Washington D.C. Georgetown University Press.
5. Li, Nan, 2001. From Revolutionary Internationalism to Conservative Nationalism: the Chinese Military’s Discourse on National Security and Identity in the Post-Mao Era. Washington DC: United States Institute of Peace.
6. Mangold, Peter. 1990. National Security and International Relations. Landon and New York: Routledge.
7. Posen, Barry R. 1984. The Sources of Military Doctrine: France, Britain, and Germany Between the World Wars .Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
8. Richards, James R. 1999. Transnational Criminal Organizations, Cybercrime, and Money Laundering. London: CRC Press.
9. Stares ed., Paul B. 1998. The New Security Agenda: A Global Security, Tokyo, Japan Center for International Exchange.
10. Terriff, Terry. Stuart Croft, Lucy James and Patrick M. Morgan, 1999.Security Studies Today, Polity Press, Cambridge.

（二）專書論文

1. Williams, Phil. and Ernesto U. Savona, 1996.“Problems and Dangers Posed by Organized Transnational Crime in the Various Regions of the World,” in Phil Williams and Ernesto U. Savona (eds), The United Nations and Transnational Organized Crime, London: Frank Cass, pp.21-23.
2. Tipson, Frederick S. 1990. “National Security and the Role of Law,” in John N. Moore, Frederick S. Tipson, and Robert F. Turner (eds), National Security Law. Durham, N.C: Carolina Academic Press, pp. 3-29.

（三）期刊論文

1. Baldwin, David.1995. “Security Studies and the End of War,” World Politics, Vol. 48, No. 1, pp. 117-141.
2. Bastable, Marshall J. 1992. “From Breechloaders to Monster Guns: Sir William Armstrong and Invention of Modern Artillery, 1854-1880,” Technology and Culture, Vol. 33, No. 4, pp. 213-247.
3. Buzan, Barry. 1991. “New Patterns of Global Security in the Twenty-First Century,” International Affairs, Vol. 67, No. 3, pp. 421-440.
4. Eppright, Charles T. 1997. “Counterterrorism and Conventional Military Force: The Relationship between Political Effect and Utility.” Studies in Conflict and Terrorism, Vol. 20, pp.334.
5. Fukuyama, Francis. 1989. “The End of History,” The National Interest, Vol. 16, pp. 18.
6. Haftendorn, Helga 1995.“The Security Puzzles: Theory Building and Discipline in International Security,” International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 35, No. 5, pp.15.
7. Walt, Stephen M. 1991.“The Renaissance of Security Studies,” International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 35. No. 2, pp. 211-239.
8. Weiss, Robin A. 2001.The Leeuwenhoek Lecture 2001. Animal Origins of Human Infectious Disease, Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. pp. 957-977.
9. Williams, Phil. and Stephen Black, 1994. “Transnational Threats: Drug Trafficking and Weapons Proliferation,” Contemporary Security Policy, Vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 127-151.
10. Wolfers, Arnold. 1952. National Security as an Ambiguous Symbol, Political Science Quarterly, Vol. 67, No. 4, pp. 67.

（四）官方/政府組織出版品

1. Department of Defense, Joint Publication (JP) 1-02, “DOD Dictionary of Military and Associted Terms,” 30 November 2004, (http://www.dtic.mil/doctrine/jel/doddict/data/u/05601.html).
2. United Nations,United Nations Development Program, 1995“Redefining Security: The Human Dimension,” Current History, Vol. 94, No. 592, pp. 229-236.
3. United States Joint Forces Command, 2008. The Joint Operation Environment 2008. Suffolk: United States Joint Forces Command.

Non-conventional security and Reforms of Taiwan's Military Strategy

Wang, Kun-yi

Professor, General Education Center, National Taiwan Ocean University

abstract

After the Cold War, the problem of national security is no longer limited to only the traditional fields of politics and military security, now also include the comprehensive and non-conventional security issues. Non- conventional security threat is a“new security threat”; it is an emerging concept of security threat which happens outside the conventional war theater. Non- conventional security threats are gradually replacing the danger and damage of conventional large-scale and nuclear wars, which becoming the main threat of most nations’ survival and development. As a member of the international society, Taiwan cannot absolve from the problems brought by non- conventional security threats, these problems include: the 921 earth quake in 1999, the SARS epidemic in 2003, Super typhoon Morakot in 2009 and etc., all these natural disasters and catastrophes caused serious life and property damages, these also revealed the problems of non- conventional security have already threatened the national security of Taiwan, and the consequence of which is not less than those threats led by the traditional fields of politics and military security. Therefore, this paper is going to analyze the development of non- conventional security threat problem, the type of non- conventional security threats Taiwan is currently facing, and the corresponding counter-measures to these non- conventional security threats.

Keywords: security study、national security、non-conventional security、Taiwan's military strategy 、dense tansformation